Send press releases, job openings & all inquiries to info@pugetsoundradio.com


Puget Sound Radio® Communicates - Advertise with PSR and get results you want! Contact: Michael Easton


Does Victoria's SHAW-TV Play politics?
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.




Puget Sound Radio®    ON THE AIR    Street Talk/Shop Talk/let's Talk  ›  Does Victoria's SHAW-TV Play politics?
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 7 Guests

Does Victoria's SHAW-TV Play politics?  This thread currently has 543 views. Print
1 Pages 1 Recommend Thread
ronrob
August 15, 2008, 4:55pm Report to Moderator
Maximum Member
PSR Moderator
Location: Victoria, British Columbia
Is Shaw-TV playing politics?
by Jason Youmans
Monday Magazine

Aug. 13

One of the few groups to regularly take advantage of Shaw-TV Victoria’s mandate to open its airwaves to citizen-produced content says the station is exercising an undue amount of control over what qualifies as appropriate community programming.

In early July, Victoria Independent Community Television (ICTV) member Jack Etkin dropped a recording off at the station of American Marxist academic and activist Ralph Schoenman delivering a speech to members of the Victoria Peace Coalition and others who gathered at Camosun College in February.

But it wasn’t until August 11 that the station finally agreed to air the talk, titled “The Underlying Politics of 9/11,” in which Schoenman argues that the events that brought down New York’s World Trade Center towers was a false-flag operation used by the American government to justify extending its imperial reach over oil reserves in the Middle East.

While Schoenman’s views may be unconventional, Etkin says that does not give the station the right to determine what can and cannot be aired, especially under rules laid out by the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Division that require community television stations to provide airtime to locally produced content.

A call to Shaw-TV Victoria’s Chris Kucharski to ask why the local network took so long to schedule the Schoenman program was not returned by press time, but the e-mail correspondence between Etkin and Shaw-TV is instructive of the behind-the-scenes debate over the issue.

In an e-mail to Etkin dated July 18, a Shaw representative said “We are concerned about the unbalanced content in this DVD. It contains a lot of Mr. Schoenman’s opinions without any other point of view. Traditionally, as you know, we look for balance in our programs offered.”

In a subsequent e-mail from Shaw dated July 25, Etkin was told, “[regional programming manager] Mark [McAmmond] has viewed the program and it will not air until we have further advice from others within the Shaw company. As mentioned earlier, we remain concerned about a lack of balance, however will give you another update once further advice has been received.”

According to the CRTC’s policy framework for community-based media, among Shaw-TV’s goals should be to “Engender a high level of citizen participation and community involvement in community programming” and “Actively promote citizen access to the community channel and provide and promote the availability of related training programs.”

Etkin says Shaw has generally been willing—albeit not particularly enthusiastic—to bring ICTV’s programs to air in a timely fashion, normally within two weeks. However, he likens ICTV’s relationship with the company to fighting a marshmallow, where if constant pressure is not applied, old corporate habits bounce back—a situation he blames not on the station’s staff, but on the country’s media culture that balks at opinions and ideas outside the status quo.

‘They only give us what we’re entitled to, and now they seem bound and determined to control it,” says Etkin.

“I think the real issue is that they dare to presume to be able to censor political information, whatever they decide to do now simply follows from that,” Etkin wrote in an e-mail to Monday before receiving word the Schoenman talk would air. “Even if they decide to show it, does that mean they have taken upon themselves the ‘right’ to censor whatever speakers they don’t want people here to see in the future? From where did they get this right? Isn’t the media supposed to be on the leading edge against censorship—at least until they are the ones with the power to do the censoring themselves?”

“The Underlying Politics of 9/11” is now set to air on Saturday, August 16, at 11:30 a.m. and again on Sunday, August 17, at 10 a.m., which, Etkin adds, are the worst time slots ICTV has thus far received. Check it out to see whether it lives up to the fuss.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Oh yeah
August 16, 2008, 8:34pm Report to Moderator
Big Member
I think the 9/11 movement should be given unlimited air time.  We all know that all the information they provide is scientifically proven, tested and reviewed by piers in the engineering community and has no possible monetary gain for those giving this valuable information.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 1 - 4
boredop
August 16, 2008, 9:13pm Report to Moderator
Maximum Member
I'm surprised your words are so clear, considering your tongue is so firmly in your cheek!!  Lol!
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 2 - 4
Dudley Do Not So Right
August 17, 2008, 5:59pm Report to Moderator

Big Member
I didn't think the NY Trade Centre's postal code was in a 'SHAW' community? I just want to know when SHAW Victoria will start carring Global Vancouver HD and CTV Vancouver HD.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 3 - 4
Holden West
August 19, 2008, 6:21am Report to Moderator

Maximum Member
Gender: Male
Location: Victoria, BC
Quoted from Oh yeah
...reviewed by piers in the engineering community


I think all programming should be reviewed by waterfront promenades. I'll wager that the average wooden or concrete walkway possesses more intelligence than your average 9/11 conspirator.



Aiming for a great 2010
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 4 - 4
1 Pages 1 Recommend Thread
Print

Puget Sound Radio®    ON THE AIR    Street Talk/Shop Talk/let's Talk  ›  Does Victoria's SHAW-TV Play politics?



Powered by E-Blah Forum Software 10.3.6 © 2001-2008