|
|
voice over |
| February 21, 2008, 4:04pm |
|
|
|
$5 web fee would pay for 'illegal' music files VITO PILIECI Canwest News Service Thursday, February 21, 2008 The Songwriters Association of Canada will reveal a proposal today that would see every Canadian's monthly Internet bill increase by $5 in exchange for the ability to download as many "illegal" music files as they choose. The association says its proposal, which would require federal approval, would wipe out the need for music-selling websites such as iTunes.ca and PureTracks.ca, making it legal for one person to share a music CD with as many people as they wish, and as many times as they wish. "That's a very reasonable amount of money to [download music] legally, without fear of any legal repercussions," said Eddie Schwartz, president of the songwriters association. The organization, a lobby group that represents Canada's music composers and lyricists, is demanding an immediate amendment to the Canadian Copyright Act that would establish a new right, called the Right to Equitable Remuneration for Music File Sharing, to allow the $5 fee. Schwartz said the proposal was created at the request of federal politicians who are reviewing Canada's Copyright Act. The proposed fees could see the songwriters group collect between $500 million and $900 million annually from Canadian Internet subscribers. Sales of music in Canada were $704 million in 2006, the most recent year that sales data has been made available, a far cry from the $1.3 billion reported during the industry's peak sales year in 1999. Yet it's unclear how much damage illegal downloads actually cause, as the music industry's own figures suggest that Canadian artists may be losing only as much as $118.8 million a year. http://www.canada.com/victoriatimescolonist/news/story.html?id=475f6ad0-13d1-4e5c-b1e0-2da63b8ba73a |
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
scudmonkey |
| February 21, 2008, 8:15pm |
|
Medium Member 
|
I'm over charged for cable now. I don't down load, I'm old school, I buy the cd and put it in that slit in my dash. |
|
|
|
|
|
Brushy Ridge |
| February 21, 2008, 10:27pm |
|
Medium Member 
|
Pardon my poor gramer- but ........F**K them!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!- I refuse to pay more for internet so others can be paid for their losses. I do not steal music. If I want it, I will take my $5.00 and pay for it. If I am forced to pay the $5.00 I will go out of my way to ensure I start stealing and re-selling and profiting from as much illegal music, video or satillite, as I can.
Perhaps they should invest in the technology which will help prevent the theft of music. I refuse to pay $5.00 to enter a Walmart, because they have a shoplifting problem.
Pissed Off with High Blood Pressure. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Karaoke On Wayward Son |
| February 22, 2008, 1:00am |
|
Guest User |
Pardon my poor gramer- but ........F**K them!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!- I refuse to pay more for internet so others can be paid for their losses. I do not steal music. If I want it, I will take my $5.00 and pay for it. If I am forced to pay the $5.00 I will go out of my way to ensure I start stealing and re-selling and profiting from as much illegal music, video or satillite, as I can.
Perhaps they should invest in the technology which will help prevent the theft of music. I refuse to pay $5.00 to enter a Walmart, because they have a shoplifting problem.
Pissed Off with High Blood Pressure.
Butch up, Buttercup - it's not like it's $50 per month or anything...it's five freakin' dollars... |
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
Flamethrower |
| February 22, 2008, 1:43am |
|
|
|
Quoted from 99
Butch up, Buttercup - it's not like it's $50 per month or anything...it's five freakin' dollars...
exactly, its $5 a month! That is one more Starbucks or pint I have to do without as a penalty because *other* people download and don't pay. I currently pay for my downloads off iTunes, I will refuse to pay this tax. my 99 cents goes to the artist I download not to some slush fun in Ottawa because Johnny Bagpipes is not getting paid enough. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
HairForRadio |
| February 22, 2008, 1:53am |
|
Big Member 
Gender:  Male
Location: Home
|
If I am forced to pay the $5.00 I will go out of my way to ensure I start stealing and re-selling and profiting from as much illegal music, video or satillite, as I can.
I'm sure that somewhere, the likes of Rosa Parks, Ghandi and William Wallace are smiling upon you and wishing you well. Your courageous stand against hated oppressors like Wintersleep and State Of Shock are an inspiration to us all. In fact, when your fight is done - and it could take decades - I'd like to invite you for a celebratory small-sized popcorn shrimp platter at TGI Fridays. It'll have to be your treat, though, because I'm going to be crippled financially if I'm forced to cough up an extra fin for my cable box. |
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
Glen Quagmire |
| February 22, 2008, 2:45am |
|
 Does this look like a Q to you? Big Member 
Gender:  Male
Location: Quahog, RI
|
Is it April 1st? They can't be serious.
...not to some slush fun in Ottawa because Johnny Bagpipes is not getting paid enough.
Leave Johnny Bagpipes outta this! |
|
|
|
|
|
Oh yeah |
| February 22, 2008, 3:44am |
|
Big Member 
|
Is it April 1st? They can't be serious. Leave Johnny Bagpipes outta this!
Hey, I saw that guy at a VAncouver comedy club a few years ago. He's funny. As for the 5 bucks, anyone who is saying "it's only 5 bucks, lighten up" is obviously someone who is downloading a ton more then that every month. I don't download now, am pizzed off that the cable companies have an essential monopoly in our country and now they want to jack my rates 5 bucks because the archaic structure of the music industry is too stupid to slow down the download process. I'd also like to see an independant audit to find out exactly how much the music industry is being crippled. I honestly believe that the emergence of more independant music artists are tapping into the sales of the big labels as much as the downloaders are. The big labels are also making more cash per download than they would off CD sales based on the CD needing packaging, shipping, stocking, printing etc. The download works out to the same price for an entire disc (approximately) without all those other expenses. The margin the record labels are working with now are great than they've ever been. |
|
|
|
|
|
Poopeedoop |
| February 22, 2008, 6:03am |
|
 Medium Member 
|
Great idea...but I think the ISP's are the ones who should really pay. They're the ones allowing the illegal downloading...make them pay $5 on every account. However, I think the whole business needs a new model. And movie studios are only just beginning to feel that reality...wait until downloading speeds multiply and it takes only a few seconds to download a newly released movie.
Something has to happen somewhere. |
|
|
|
|
|
mike10 |
| February 22, 2008, 8:34am |
|
Baby Member 
|
$5 is definitely too high. If this ever happens it will probably end up less than two bucks on internet bills and the possibly a increase in blank CD/DVD copyright levies |
|
|
|
|
|
StewieGriffin |
| February 22, 2008, 9:19am |
|
Baby Member 
|
Wouldn't it make more sense to charge according to how much music someone actually illegally downloads? The technology has got to be out there to do this.
I know people who NEVER download any music, I know people that download 1-2 songs a month. Then there's people that download hundreds and hundreds of songs per month - Make them pay a higher fee!!!!!!!
Just also want to add I think a big reason the music industry has lost money over the years is because a lot of people aren't buying an entire cd anymore, they're just buying a few songs from a particular artist. 10 years ago you dished out $13 for a cd. Now if you want just 2-3 songs, that would only cost you $3. makes sense no?
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Karaoke On Wayward Son |
| February 22, 2008, 11:38am |
|
Guest User |
Pay your 5 bucks a month and then sharing files on the internet is free from prosecution and legal - five bucks gets you all the songs you want - this versus a buck a song at iTunes...
Simple economics - do the math.
As it stands right now, in Canada it's not illegal to share music files on-line, but it is in the Excited States.
Besides - you really think that 100% of the money you pay on i-Tunes goes to the artist? Apple already has enough money methinks... |
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
StewieGriffin |
| February 22, 2008, 5:13pm |
|
Baby Member 
|
Yeah ok....It's five freaking dollars, but for someone like me that only downloads 1-2 songs a month, it's bulls**t. Excuse my language.
It's a bigger shame for those that occasionally surf the net and check there email once or twice a month. |
|
|
|
|
|
VancouverTVGuy |
| February 22, 2008, 7:54pm |
|
Big Member 
|
This is a ridiculous idea. Purchasing music off the internet should be user-pay. Period. Maybe the ISPs could do a better job of identifying illegal downloaders and stopping them dead instead of passing the buck onto the end user. |
|
Logged |
Online |
|
|
|
CRS |
| February 23, 2008, 1:41am |
|
 Big Member 
Gender:  Male
|
what's NEXT? a hike in the Basic Cable rate of 5 to 10 bucks a month to offset the lost revenue of the major TV networks & movie studios from consumers who tape movies or episodes of their favorite show??? cuff me now and haul me away. i've been taping shows for YEARS!!!!  |
| Local Radio OUT!!  |
|
|
|
|
|
|