Connecting the Radio & Television Industries
Follow us on Twitter
Click here for the last 100 entries in PSR's Portal Today in
Broadcast History


Welcome, Guest.Please login or register.


Puget Sound Radio    RATINGS NEWS    S4 2009 Ratings  ›  Vancouver S4 Fall 2009 PPM Ratings 2+

Vancouver S4 Fall 2009 PPM Ratings 2+  This thread currently has 7,628 views. Print
2 Pages 1 2 » All Recommend Thread
mikedup
December 10, 2009, 6:17pm Report to Moderator

Admins
Posts: 2,942
VANCOUVER S4 PPM RATINGS FALL  2009  2+
                        S4 09                    S3 09                     change

CKNW               12.9                       11.5                    +1.4
CHQM                8.5                         7.5                     +1.0
CBU                   7.6                        11.6                     -4.0
CKLG (Jack FM)    7.3                         4.9                     +2.4
CFBT                  6.4                         7.5                     -1.1
CKZZ                  5.9                         4.7                     +1.2
CJJR                   5.5                         3.9                     +1.6
CFOX                  5.3                         4.3                     +1.0
CKCL                  4.8                          4.2                     +0.6
CISL                   4.8                          3.4                     +1.4
CFMI                  4.2                           5.5                     -1.3
CKWX                 4.2                           4.3                     -0.1
CKST                  3.6                           3.2                     +0.4
CBU-FM               3.5                           4.4                    -0.9    
CFUN                  1.8                           1.8                      n/c
CKPK                   1.2                           1.8                    -0.6
CHHR                   0.9                           0.3                    +0.6
CHMJ                   0.7                           0.7                     n/c
KWPZ                  --                             1.9                    -1.9
Logged Offline
Private Message
Vanoldtimes
December 10, 2009, 6:27pm Report to Moderator
Member
Posts: 46
Nice to see CISL jump up :)
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 1 - 22
improsteve
December 10, 2009, 6:47pm Report to Moderator
Member
Posts: 129
That's quite the collapse for the Mother Corp.  Is this the first full PPM measurement?
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 2 - 22
Amplifried
December 10, 2009, 7:12pm Report to Moderator
Member
Posts: 158
This is the last diary "book", and does not incorporate PPM data, which is released separately.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 3 - 22
Andy
December 10, 2009, 8:11pm Report to Moderator
Guest User
Quoted from Amplifried
This is the last diary "book", and does not incorporate PPM data, which is released separately.


This is a PPM book, which is now the official rule of measurement.  Diaries were filled out, but PPM is now in effect for sales purposes.  



Logged
E-mail Reply: 4 - 22
Lois Cooper
December 10, 2009, 8:53pm Report to Moderator
Member
Posts: 0
The numbers that are shown here as "S4" are the PPM numbers

The Shore is 0.9 ..... 0.1 behind the 1 share I predicted.... I'm just sayin'

Sarah ... any thoughts?
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 5 - 22
Martonio
December 10, 2009, 10:32pm Report to Moderator

Member
Posts: 279
Jack sure moved up...I guess people don't give a crap if they hear a DJ or not.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 6 - 22
Sarah Daniels
December 10, 2009, 11:25pm Report to Moderator

Member
Posts: 712
What do I think, Marathon? Well, that you are the Jon Gosselin of the board, but that's not the question. Check the PPM's - Shore is a 2.2 for men 35-54....not bad for a completely different and new format in six months with no advertising. It's always amazing to me how when something new and exciting hits the airwaves, people piss all over it.

That will be my only comment here, I will be otherwise detained watching paint dry.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 7 - 22
Von Sompson The Third
December 11, 2009, 12:54am Report to Moderator
Guest User
I fail to see where pointing out low ratings is "pissing all over something".  Some of these people wondering about this may like the stations and are concerned that due the the low ratings, a change in on-air and format may be next in line.

Just because we (radio people) find a station fresh and exciting doesn't mean the masses will.  Sure there may people within the station that put a lot of passion into the product...but if people continue to stay way, big changes may have to be made.

I call it the "Ishtar" effect.  Lots of people put love into that movie (like some of the stations here) but that didn't translate into anything except failure.  Look at The Peak...they've been going for over a year and still haven't reached the level of where their AM station was.  Yet I'm sure the people behind the scenes feel like everyone has given 110%.  And I bet they are very proud of their station.  But none of that means anything if no one is listening...or worse...listen for a bit and don't come back.

It's sad, but true.
Logged
E-mail Reply: 8 - 22
ontrack
December 11, 2009, 3:59am Report to Moderator
Member
Posts: 350
Quoted from Sarah Daniels
Check the PPM's - Shore is a 2.2 for men 35-54....not bad for a completely different and new format in six months with no advertising.


Sarah.... no advertising? You do still live in Vancouver, no? Did you miss all the "Roots, Rock and Rhythm" buses, not to mention their sponsorship and presentation of the Celebration of Light?
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 9 - 22
Amplifried
December 11, 2009, 4:22am Report to Moderator
Member
Posts: 158
Quoted from 549
Look at The Peak...they've been going for over a year and still haven't reached the level of where their AM station was.  
A lot of people have been dumping on the PEAK on this site, and the comparison with AM 600 is somewhat non-nonsensical given the adult standards audience is not what you'd call "prime" for advertisers.  I think any station would rather attract earners and spenders than retirees.  The age old rule is if you want cume, put nostalgia on the air.  It doesn't guarantee profit.  I also scoured the final "book" based on diary measurement today...and the PEAK was actually pretty solid.  It worked the other way for different stations.  Some had great PPM's and poor diaries.

BTW...I for one, LOVE the Shore, and hope they keep doing what they're doing.

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 10 - 22
hoof hearted
December 11, 2009, 4:26am Report to Moderator
Guest User
Maybe someone has the answer to this. Why is it that Praise-106 in Lynden is included in the PPM ratings and the Bellingham stations...namely 104.3 KAFE and 92.9 KISM are not?  I know of alot of people north of the 49th that listen to KAFE.  Just curious...
Logged
E-mail Reply: 11 - 22
bigbangboom
December 11, 2009, 4:44am Report to Moderator
Member
Posts: 62
Why is it that Praise-106 in Lynden is included in the PPM ratings

- My guess is the sizable number of listeners in Abbotsford and the Valley, and partly in Langley West to Van...just a guess...

In regards to ratings I'm surprised all the AMs did so well with PPM...I thought FMs would come out WAY ahead...

As for the Peak...all the haters should ease up...this is a station getting LOTS of attention from people in their 20s who didn't use to listen to radio, "they don't play my kind of music"...same for Shore I think, but the Peak definitely has that younger Triple A audience, which will translate into a solid brand in 5-7 years...from my observations Pattison stations like to build long-term

FYI - I don't work in radio, but I watch the numbers ;)

Kudos to CFOX! O'Neil and the rest are great!

Any word on other BC Books...er...Data?
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 12 - 22
bigtalker
December 11, 2009, 4:51am Report to Moderator
Guest User
Quoted from 931
Maybe someone has the answer to this. Why is it that Praise-106 in Lynden is included in the PPM ratings and the Bellingham stations...namely 104.3 KAFE and 92.9 KISM are not?  I know of alot of people north of the 49th that listen to KAFE.  Just curious...
any station on any side of the border can choose to be rated. as long as the check clears.
simple as that
Logged
E-mail Reply: 13 - 22
Von Sompson The Third
December 11, 2009, 5:59am Report to Moderator
Guest User
Quoted Text
A lot of people have been dumping on the PEAK on this site, and the comparison with AM 600
I wasn't dumping on the Peak...just pointing out a fact.  Having a station that WAS sitting around a 3 to revamp and have it hover around a 1 is something that can't be making head office jumping with joy. And make no mistake, I'm sure they expected big things to happen with the Peak. Lord knows they've done enough to push the brand...signage is everywhere.

Quoted Text
this is a station getting LOTS of attention from people in their 20s who didn't use to listen to radio
The overall ratings would seem to disagree with you.  Just because those in your circle listen to it doesn't mean everyone is doing the same.  Again...see the start of this thread.

Why is it that when someone here points out something based on the data that he/she is "dumping" on something.  I had NOTHING...repeat...NOTHING to do with how the ratings came out.  It's not my fault that no one is listening to the bottom stations.  And if it weren't these stations at the bottom then it would be some other station(s) that we'd be talking about right now.  Someone will always be at the bottom and someone will always be at the top.

If the Peak had a 10 share I wouldn't have mentioned it.  But it didn't...it landed a 1.2 this time...which...no matter how you slice it...isn't very good (to be blunt - it sucks - not the station...the rating of 1.2).  And the reason I'm not bringing up SHORE is simply because they haven't reached the one year mark yet.  And unless things start to change there, I'm sure this time next year the thread will be chatting about them in much the same way as I have mentioned the Peak.

Do I want that...no.  I would love it if all the stations came out about even.  That would be fantastic...just not realistic.
Logged
E-mail Reply: 14 - 22
2 Pages 1 2 » All Recommend Thread
Print

Puget Sound Radio    RATINGS NEWS    S4 2009 Ratings  ›  Vancouver S4 Fall 2009 PPM Ratings 2+








Powered by E-Blah Forum Software 10.3.6 © 2001-2008